Responsible Wealth Join RWContact RWOrder Info

This Year's Campaign | Previous Campaigns | Q & A

RW Home

About RW

Press Room

Shareholder Initiatives

Tax Fairness

Action Alerts

RW Newsletter

Links

United for a Fair Economy
 


Status

Annual meeting held May 28, 2003

% voting YES: 4.1%

Shareholder resolutions face a variety of obstacles. For this reason, it is considered significant if a resolution garners at least 5% of the vote. Votes over 10% indicate exceptional shareholder support for an issue.

Filers of "social-issue" resolutions generally don't expect their resolution to receive a majority vote and be adopted by management. Rather, filers use these resolutions to get management's attention, and to raise the issue with other shareholders. They hope to achieve a vote sufficient to allow them to return the next year.

According to SEC rules, a resolution must receive 3% of the vote the first year it is filed, 6% in year two and 10% thereafter in order to be included on the proxy the following year.

 

 

Exxon-Mobil

Competitive Board Elections

WHEREAS:

Shareholders have the right to elect directors, yet at each year’s annual meeting, shareholders are presented a slate of nominees with the same number of candidates as the number of seats to be filled. While shareholders have the legal right to communicate with all the Company’s shareholders and urge them to write in one or more candidates, that procedure is so expensive that it is very rarely feasible. As a result, as a practical matter shareholders do not have the opportunity to evaluate and choose between competing candidates.

Our resolution would not give any shareholder or shareholder group a new right to cause their candidate to appear on the slate. Rather, it would merely require the Company’s Board, through its own nominating committee (the Board Affairs Committee), to find additional candidates that it deems qualified for the position.

We in the United States believe that competition increases quality and that election generally implies a choice between competing candidates. We believe that following these principles in board elections would well serve the Company and its shareholders.

RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Exxon Mobil’s next election of directors include a slate of nominees that is larger than the number of available Board seats by at least 50%.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT:

We believe that in this time when investor confidence in equity markets has been severely shaken, a broad examination of our institutions’ governance is in order. Our proposal is a moderate step in that direction.

Please vote FOR this proposal.

 

 

Top of Page
RW Home | About RW | Living Wage | Shareholder Initiatives | Tax Fairness | Action Alerts | RW Newsletter |
RW Conference | Links | United for a Fair Economy | Join RW | Contact RW | Order Info

Responsible Wealth, 29 Winter Street, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02108.
Voice: 617/423-2148 Fax: 617/423-0191.
© 2003 Responsible Wealth. All rights reserved.