|
|
Status
SEC
allowed resolution to be omitted.
|
| |
General Electric
Create an Independent Board
of Directors
THE MAJORITY OF DIRECTORS
TO BE INDEPENDENT
To enhance shareholder
value General Electric shareholders recommend increased independence for
our directors. This proposal recommends a majority of directors on the
full board be independent, for instance a 60% majority.
The standard of independence
is the standard in the Council
of Institutional
Investors: "A director is deemed independent if his or her only
non-trivial professional, familial or financial connection to the corporation
or its CEO is his or her directorship."
This proposal is requested
to be implemented as quickly as possible as openings occur on the board.
The independent directors alone would decide whether implementation is
proceeding as quickly as possible. Also, require that any future action
on this topic be put to shareholder vote - as a separate proposal.
This proposal topic
won a significant 31% of the yes-no votes in 2001
GE has a serious lack
of independent directors. The majority of the board is made up of:
- Current employees
- Former employees
- Directors who collect
legal and financial service fees from GE
According to an independent
analysis of the 2001 GE proxy:
- 63% of the full
GE Board is not independent.
"At least two-thirds
of a corporation's directors should be independent," according to
the Council of Institutional Investors. Institutional shareholders own
a majority of GE stock.
Furthermore:
- 50% of the Nominating
Committee is not independent.
- 50% of the Audit
Committee is not independent.
- 50% of the Compensation
Committee is not independent.
"All members
of these committees should be independent," according to the Council
of Institutional Investors.
The independence of
directors is of greater importance at GE since:
1) A director pension
plan could further compromise the independence of GE
directors. All the directors who joined the Board before 2001 continue
to participate in a generous pension plan. Many large companies have eliminated
pensions for all directors. Director pensions can align directors with
management in contrast to the interests of all shareholders.
2) Three of the 7 independent directors, on a board of 19, have long tenure
which can impact their independence:
- Ms. Michelson 26
years
- Mr. Rhodes 18 years
- Mr. Sigler 18 years
What incentive is
there for good corporate governance - highlighted by increased director
independence?
A survey by McKinsey
& Co., international management consultant, shows that institutional
investors are prepared to pay an 18% premium for good corporate governance
(Wall Street Journal, June 19, 2000).
In the interest of
shareholder value and independent oversight of our company vote yes:
THE MAJORITY OF DIRECTORS TO BE INDEPENDENT. YES ON 4.
|