|
Press
Release
For Immediate Release - April 5, 2000
Contacts: Stacie Garnett (617) 423-2148 x19 | Betsy Leondar-Wright
(617) 423-2148 x13
bleondar-wright@faireconomy.org
As CEO Pay Rockets Higher,
Shareholders Urge
Companies to Share the Rewards More Widely
Responsible
Wealth members have filed 14 shareholder resolutions to encourage
companies to share profits more widely with employees. The varied
resolutions call on companies to link CEO compensation to worker
compensation and freeze CEO pay after layoffs; others address corporate
lobbying, campaign contributions, corporate governance and corporate
welfare. Resolutions will be voted on this spring at General Electric,
Honeywell, American International Group, AT&T, Raytheon and
Huffy.
New reports
by Bloomberg, Forbes, USA Today and the New York Times all point
to another record-breaking year for CEO compensation at a time of
only tiny advances by average workers after years of falling real
wages. The Wall Street Journal and Business Week release their CEO
pay reports this week. According to the New York Times, average
CEO compensation jumped 23 percent, to $11.9 million, in 1999. "Thanks
to stock and options from previous years," the Times reports,
"the average corporate leader has squirreled away holdings
worth an additional $75 million." Average full-time worker
pay, meanwhile, rose a mere 3 percent in 1999 to about $33,000.
"Companies
that make CEOs megamillionaires and billionaires while shortchanging
most employees are building on quicksand," says Scott Klinger,
Co-director of Responsible Wealth.
Among the Responsible
Wealth shareholder resolutions, four --General Electric, Citigroup,
Honeywell and American International Group -- are directed at companies
whose CEOs were among the top 20 in 1999 salary and bonus, excluding
stock options, according to the Bloomberg report by Graef Crystal.
Honeywell CEO Michael
Bonsignore made
almost $54 million in 1999 while 11,600 workers are being laid off
worldwide due to the merger with AlliedSignal. A shareholder resolution
asks Honeywell to establish a maximum ratio between the pay of the
CEO and the lowest paid worker.
General Electric
CEO Jack Welch made over $93 million in 1999 -- an amount equivalent
to 14 percent of the profit from the sale of GE appliances. GE is
also one of the nations biggest campaign contributors and
beneficiaries of corporate welfare. According to Time, "There
is no starker example of the phenomenon of corporate welfare and
vanishing jobs than General Electric." A resolution asks the
company to report to shareholders on its lobbying practices, campaign
contributions and use of shareholder funds for political purposes.
Another resolution calling for a report on corporate welfare was
excluded by an SEC decision.
AT&T, another
big beneficiary of corporate welfare, is the subject of a resolution
asking it to report on the financial benefit received by the company
from government subsidies, including direct subsidies, tax abatements
and government-backed below-market financing. Another resolution
asks AT&T to freeze executive compensation during periods of
downsizing. "Corporate executives should not have all the gain
while regular employees have all the pain," said Judith Barnet,
an AT&T shareholder who filed the resolution.
Similar resolutions
were filed at Huffy and Raytheon. After announcing it would lay
off more than 15,000 workers in 1998, Raytheon increased the salary
and bonuses of its top four officers by more than 30 percent. Studies
by the American Management Association and Wharton Business School
show that downsizing often has negative impacts on company success.
Responsible
Wealth is also addressing the self-serving nature of corporate boards
stacked with corporate officers by challenging companies to make
their governance more democratic. A shareholder resolution filed
at American International Group calls on the company to nominate
50 percent more director candidates than the number of seats available
on the board. Currently, the AIG board has a majority of insider
directors.
Shareholder
resolutions filed with Citigroup and Walt Disney called upon each
company to create a universal employee stock ownership plan and
fund it with an annual stock contribution at least equal to the
value of stock options and awards given to corporate officers. As
the Disney resolution notes, if only half the over $1 billion CEO
Michael Eisner has reaped from exercising stock options since 1992
had been divided among Disneys 117,000 worldwide employees,
they would have received, on average, over $4,200 each, leaving
Eisner with the still massive sum of $500 million.
Both companies
convinced the Securities and Exchange Commission to exclude the
resolutions because they deal with employee benefits, a part of
"ordinary business" that shareholders may not vote on.
The SEC also excluded resolutions at American Home Products and
MBNA that called for reports on employee stock ownership.
Responsible
Wealth member Michele McGeoy, CEO of the California-based technology
firm RH Solutions, spoke in favor of the excluded Disney resolution
at the February shareholder meeting. "Its time that Disney
think of its employees as assets, not just Mickey Mouse," McGeoy
said to loud applause.
Objecting to
the SEC decisions, Scott Klinger said, "The SEC should be part
of the solution to harmful compensation practices, not part of the
problem. There is clear and consistent evidence that broad-based
employee ownership improves corporate performance and enhances shareholder
value."
Responsible
Wealth is a growing network of over 450 businesspeople, investors
and affluent Americans in the top 5% of income and wealth who are
concerned about growing economic inequality and working to promote
widely shared prosperity. It is affiliated with the national nonprofit
organization, United for a Fair Economy.
Responsible
Wealth recently released a groundbreaking report, "Choosing
the High Road: Businesses That Pay a Living Wage and Prosper."
The report and the shareholder resolutions are available online
at www.responsiblewealth.org
and upon request.
|